Algebraic Thinking and Habits of Mind: A Systematic Review of Conceptual Foundations and Pedagogical Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1004Keywords:
Algebraic thinking, Algebraic habits of mind, Systematic reviewAbstract
Algebraic thinking, a cornerstone of mathematical literacy, supports learners in recognizing patterns, articulating relationships, and forming generalizations across representations. However, persistent challenges—particularly in understanding variables, equivalence, and structural relationships—reveal that its development requires more than procedural fluency. Emerging research highlights the role of algebraic habits of mind—cognitive dispositions such as doing and undoing, building rules to represent functions, and abstracting from computation—in fostering flexible reasoning about mathematical structures. This study presents a systematic review conducted within the TÜBİTAK 1001 Project (No. 223K317), synthesizing 41 empirical and theoretical studies published between 1990 and 2024. Following the updated PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review addresses three objectives: (1) identifying the conceptual components of algebraic thinking, (2) examining recurring cognitive and pedagogical challenges in developing algebraic habits of mind, and (3) deriving implications for instructional design that cultivates structural reasoning and representational fluency. Findings indicate that difficulties often stem from fragmented representational understanding, limited structural awareness, and procedural teaching orientations. The review underscores the importance of integrating multiple representations, scaffolding generalization and justification, and aligning instruction with reasoning-centered practices. These insights inform the design of evidence-based professional learning programs aimed at supporting teachers in cultivating algebraic thinking and algebraic habits of mind.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

