Evaluation of Physical Education Teacher's Opinions on the Field Exam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1051067Keywords:
Physical education, Pre-service teacher, Field examAbstract
The concept of teaching is a profession whose value will never decrease with its meaning and responsibility. Teaching and raising people requires great skill. A long and arduous road awaits newly appointed teachers. Various changes have been made in our country recently regarding the appointment of teachers. Due to the difference between the number of teacher candidates graduating from education faculties and the number of teacher candidates to be appointed by the Ministry of National Education (MEB) in line with the needs, different practices were applied in the way of selecting and appointing teachers during the change periods. Therefore, it is seen that teacher candidates face different problems in this process. The aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of physical education teacher candidates about the field exam. The research is a qualitative study. The research group consists of 20 physical education teacher candidates and this study group was determined by the maximum diversity sampling method. In the research, face-to-face interview technique was used on a voluntary basis with 20 physical education teacher candidates studying at Gaziantep University Faculty of Sport Sciences. In the research, using the interview method, which is one of the qualitative research methods, the data obtained were analyzed by the content analysis method. As a result of the research, it was stated that physical education teacher candidates considered the field exam as boring and tiring. In addition, although the research group generally saw the field exam negatively, it was concluded that the exam was an exam that created anxiety and stress.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.