Classroom-based and Online-based Evaluation of Students and Comparative Analysis of Their Achievements in both Scenarios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1071436Keywords:
mathematics teaching methodology, student evaluation, distance teaching-learningAbstract
The COVID19 pandemic made a significant impact on every aspect of everyday life. Educational systems around the world applied different strategies in fighting the limitations imposed by their governments. Some countries opted to continue normal schooling while applying all epidemic measures, some opted for online schooling, some to tele-schooling and others applied combined regime of schooling. The educational system in the Republic of Serbia in the school year 2020/2021 was organized as a combination of standard classroom-based teaching with all epidemic measures and television-based distance teaching-learning. After the epidemic situation worsened, all schools shifted to online-based distance teaching-learning. In this paper we will explain the student evaluation process in both the combined regime of schooling and in the online distance teaching of mathematics in elementary school “Ujedinjene nacije” in Belgrade, Serbia. Also, we will introduce the mathematics teaching methodology and evaluation methodology applied in both cases. After that, we will compare the student achievements in both classroom-based and online-based evaluation and discuss problems we encountered during the evaluation in both scenarios. Finally, we will draw conclusions on evaluation methodology and obtained results and propose possible solutions to the problems we were faced with.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.