Comparison of Indonesian and Japanese Textbooks on Integer Concepts: A Praxeological Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.982Keywords:
Praxeological analysis, Mathematics textbooks, Integer conceptsAbstract
Mathematics textbooks played a crucial role in shaping students' understanding and mastery of mathematical concepts. As essential resources in formal education, they fostered critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills. However, textbook quality and design varied significantly, affecting their effectiveness in supporting meaningful learning. This study examined how mathematics textbooks from different educational systems addressed the teaching of integers, focusing on Indonesia’s Kurikulum Merdeka and Japan’s Gakko Tosho textbooks. Using qualitative methods and hermeneutic phenomenological approaches, the analysis evaluated how these textbooks presented integer concepts to align with students' needs and contexts. The findings revealed significant differences in contextual alignment, task design, and concept integration. Kurikulum Merdeka textbooks emphasized procedural skills and provided theoretical support but lacked contextual relevance and coherence. In contrast, Gakko Tosho textbooks adopted a systematic, exploratory approach with integrated real-world tasks, enhancing conceptual understanding. This study contributed to mathematics education by highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of these didactic approaches. The findings served as a foundation for improving mathematics textbook design in Indonesia and globally, promoting a balance between procedural skills and conceptual understanding.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

