The Essence of Students' Adaptive Reasoning Ability in Mathematics Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.984Keywords:
Adaptive reasoning, Mathematics learning, Systematic AnalysisAbstract
Adaptive reasoning is an essential ability in learning mathematics, which helps students face challenges in problem-solving. This study aims to identify the essence of adaptive reasoning skills through a systematic literature analysis using the content analysis method of a number of articles published in Scopus and Sinta-accredited journals during the period 2013-2024. The main focus of this study was to explore research contributions related to adaptive reasoning, including year of publication, research subject, research design, methods, and learning approaches used, characteristics, and influencing factors. From a total of 66 articles, 19 publications met the inclusion and exclusion criteria after the screening process. After further analysis, 17 articles were selected as the primary sources in this study. Reporting of the study refers to the modified PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines as the standard for conducting systematic literature reviews. The authors highlighted, evaluated, and discussed the importance of the SLR approach in this study. The findings show that most of the studies used experimental designs (29.41%) and qualitative description investigations (23.53%), with the main focus on junior high school students (35.29%). Learning methods such as STEM, CPS, and PBL proved effective in improving adaptive reasoning skills. The results provide important insights into adaptive reasoning in mathematics learning, as well as the importance of innovative learning strategies to support its development.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

