A Bibliometric Review of Counselors’ Professional Competency Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.986Keywords:
Counselor professional competencies, Clinical supervision, Professional identity, Bibliometric analysisAbstract
Research on counselor professional competencies has gained attention due to its crucial role in shaping effective counseling practices and strengthening professional identity. Although a growing body of literature exists, the motivations, contexts, and findings remain diverse. Therefore, this study conducts a bibliometric analysis to map the patterns and directions of research on counselor professional competencies. A total of 241 documents, comprising 223 journal articles and 18 reviews, were extracted from the Scopus database covering the period from 1957 to 2025. We employed RStudio, VOSviewer, and Microsoft Excel for citation, content, and network analyses. The bibliometric analysis was complemented by a systematic review of relevant publications. The results reveal that the United States dominates the research output, followed by Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Co-authorship patterns show relatively low levels of international collaboration. The cartography analysis identified three major research clusters: (1) ethics and professional practice in genetic counseling, (2) clinical supervision and counselor professional development, and (3) clinical competencies, counseling practice, and therapeutic effectiveness. This study represents the first bibliometric review of counselor professional competencies, addressing gaps in the literature and offering directions for future research, particularly in the integration of supervision, cultural competence, and the development of professional identity in diverse socio-cultural contexts.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.

