Ethical-AI Pedagogy: Developing Moral Reasoning and Digital Responsibility Among Students in the Age of Intelligent Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1023

Keywords:

AI ethics education, Moral thinking, Digital responsibility

Abstract

The development of intelligent systems that are increasingly integrated into academic activities has transformed how students seek information, assess source credibility, and make decisions. However, this increased access and efficiency are not always accompanied by ethical readiness, especially concerning algorithmic bias, data privacy, automated decision-making, and the boundaries of AI use in academic contexts. This study aims to analyse how AI Ethics education can shape students’ moral thinking and digital responsibility in the era of intelligent systems. Using a mixed-methods explanatory design, this research combines quantitative surveys with focus group discussions and individual reflections to capture experiences, risk perceptions, and moral dilemmas arising from the use of AI technology. The results indicate that understanding AI Ethics significantly influences students’ digital responsibility. Although students actively use various AI-based applications, their ethical understanding remains moderate and somewhat ambiguous, particularly regarding digital plagiarism, system bias, and algorithmic mechanisms. Case-based AI Ethics educational interventions have been shown to enhance moral sensitivity, digital caution, and students’ reflective capacity. These findings underscore the urgency of integrating AI ethics into higher education curricula as a strategic effort to prepare a generation that is not only skilled in utilising technology but also morally responsible within a complex and often opaque digital ecosystem.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ethical-AI Pedagogy: Developing Moral Reasoning and Digital Responsibility Among Students in the Age of Intelligent Systems. (2026). The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 49, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1023