Cognitive Levels and Misconceptions of Grade 11 Lebanese Students in Probability
Keywords:
Mathematics, Probability, Secondary level, Misconceptions, Solo taxonomyAbstract
The concept of probability is fundamental to students especially at the secondary school level. Learning probability is always linked to logic and reasoning. This paper aims at unveiling the cognitive levels in probability and exploring the probability misconceptions of a sample of 41 grade 11 Lebanese students at the end of their academic year during which they encountered probability as a subject in school for the first time. The approach to data collection is quantitative and qualitative. The 25 item questionnaire in Paul and Hlanganipai (2014) was used to determine the students’ cognitive levels in probability based on SOLO taxonomy and using the rubrics used in Watson and Collis (1994). The questionnaire is divided into 5 categories: probability terms and definitions, theoretical probability, Venn diagrams, union and intersection and dependent and independent events. After that 10 students were randomly selected from the sample and interviewed to explore two probability misconceptions: representativeness and equiprobability bias. Results showed that grade 11 students attained level 3 in two of the categories and were able to reach level 2 in two other categories while they remained at level 1 in the fifth categories. As for the students’ misconceptions, representativeness misconception was rarely found while equiprobability bias was more prevalent.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.