Assessing Scientific Thinking in Early Childhood: Development and Validation of the Scientific Thinking Skills Assessment Tool (STS-AT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.949Keywords:
Scientific thinking, Early childhood, Assessment, Scale development, ValidityAbstract
This study reports the development and validation of the Scientific Thinking Skills Assessment Tool (STS-AT), designed to measure scientific thinking in children aged 5–8 years. The STS-AT assesses four domains: critical inquiry, hypothesis testing, analytical interpretation, and metacognitive awareness. Item development was guided by theoretical frameworks and expert review, followed by pilot testing with 72 children, which demonstrated clarity and inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s κ = 0.88). The final instrument comprised 12 open-ended tasks supported with visual aids and scored on a four-point rubric. The main study involved 282 children from Turkish kindergartens and primary schools. Reliability analyses indicated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .87) and high test–retest stability (r = .91). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure with excellent fit (RMSEA = .04, CFI = .95, TLI = .93, SRMR = .06). Results showed significant improvements in scientific thinking with age (F(3,278) = 18.81, p < .001, η² = 0.17), while no gender differences were observed (t = -1.01, p = 0.315). These findings suggest that the STS-AT is a valid, reliable, and developmentally appropriate tool for assessing scientific thinking in early childhood.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.