AN INVESTIGATION INTO EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC GEOMETRY SOFTWARE (DGS) ON STUDENTS’ THINKING PREFERENCES: SOLVING GEOMETRY PROBLEMS WITH AND WITHOUT DGS
Keywords:
Dynamic geometry environment, prospective teachers, geometryAbstract
Researchers suggest that students have preferences (visual and non-visual) when solving mathematics problems. Many times students have difficulties in solving problems because of one-sided thinking and weakly associating other representations. Reform efforts support connecting visual representations with non-visual representations in order to develop deeper understanding. This study investigates how prospective teachers with different preferences for visual, non-visual, and harmonic thinking solve geometry problems with and without using DGS. The study aims to explore whether students’ use of DGS when solving geometry problems is related to their preferences. Suwarsono’s mathematical processing instrument (MPI) was administered to determine their preferences for visual and non-visual thinking. Based on MPI instrument’s results and their performances of geometry problems solved with and without DGS, three students were selected to be interviewed. Multiple case studies were conducted to conduct a deeper analysis. The reason for selecting three students was to take at least one person from each group based on their thinking preferences so that different cases can be compared and contrasted. The results reveal that regardless of students’ preferences preservice teachers preferred to use visual solutions when they are asked to use DGS. When their solutions of DGS and paper-and-pencil were compared, students’ solutions with DGS demonstrated more conceptual understanding of the task than paper-and-pencil.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.